Thursday, November 27, 2008

Let Us Now Praise Famous Fonts


I never thought I'd become that guy who gets all worked up about graphic design and type-face and all, but I've recently fallen in love with the work of a dude named David Pearson, probably most recognizable for his work on the recent Penguin Great Ideas line.


Now on some level I've got mixed feelings about this line. Putting out stuff like Seneca and Montaigne in friendly, pocket-sized editions (not to mention two very cleverly selected little Orwell collections) is a good thing, charging eight or nine dollars for at most around 200 petite pages, maybe not so much. However, part of what you're paying here is the packaging, and the packaging is gorgeous.

I've got Orwell's Why I Write sitting on my desk next to me, and it is basically just a ton of fun to have around. The cover stock is heavyish with a very satisfying and subtle pulpiness, with tasteful embossing, and the interior paper is clean and bright with a little bit of nice grain visible under the right light. The trade dress for each 20-book volume is classy, with uniform spines and covers using black, white, and one of three spot-colors depending on the volume. It's one of those books that makes you feel better just to look at, and the same is true as the other books in the line I've seen.

Pearson's cover designs run the gamut from the minimalism of The Communist Manifesto and Seneca's On the Shortness of Life (which seems to use the same font as Wes Anderson's movies, oddly) to the ornate dress of Montaigne's On Friendship, to the homily florid, almost Beat-looking design of Tolstoy's Confession. The Proust volume has a great looking Art Nouveau while the Tolstoy is rocking a sort of Proletkult, protest poster aesthetic. There are a lot of clever decisions in the line, none more clever than Walter Benjamin's The Work of in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, which is a terrific visual pun.

Overall, price aside, these are beautiful, beautiful editions of books ranging from, I'd say, pretty worthwhile to fucking essential to being a human being. Keep an eye out for them-- I've found a number of them for very cheap at thrift stores and on amazon.

Sunday, September 7, 2008

Wolfgang

Some decent finds at Wolfgang today: here goes!

Lately I've been hearing some buzz about this Polish author, Witold Gombrowicz. He died in 1969 so I guess all this excitement has been a long time coming. The big thing I've seen him in connection to is this sort of absurdist roman a clef the name of which I can't recall, but I decided to start with Bacacay, a book of short fiction. The inside flap talks about "a balloonist... beset by erotic lepers..." so I'm expecting good things.

I also picked up Down and Out in Paris and London, which I have been wistfully admiring in book stores for the better part of the year. It was 25% off so I figured I might as well get it over with. I'm a big fan of Orwell's memoir work, much more so than his political allegories, and I've heard very good things about this book. I'm considering reading it alongside Kitchen Confidential since they seem to cover eerily similar ground.

Roethke's collected poems was five bucks so there wasn't much waffling around on that one. It is gorgeous. I'll probably post some things from it later. In the check-out line I also nabbed some Edna St. Vincent-Millay. Dunno why, but it was a dollar.

Some things I loved but regrettably did not have the money to buy, really: Selected Writings of Gertrude Stein, Motherless Brooklyn, and some Myla Goldberg stories.

Basically I love it all.

Sunday, March 23, 2008

Band of Outsiders




















Jean-Luc Godard

This Thing: Is the Criterion release of Godard's 1964 ode to shitty American crime novels.

Best Bit: The Madison. Anna Karina's beautiful and ungainly Odile. Sami Frey's bizarre and weirdly slick little gestures and tics. The DVD has some pretty decent extras on it too, particularly a guide to Godard's nods and references throughout the film.

Worst Bit: Band of Outsiders has a pretty wide-spread reputation as a relatively mediocre movie as far as Godard goes-- which to an extent is true, I guess. It is a bit slight, and somewhat unevenly paced.

Couldn't Believe: How imperfectly I'd remembered this movie. I last saw it on VHS a number of years ago, and mainly kept a lot of its playfulness and the coy attitude of its first hour or so. I think this is basically the way it goes, considering the scenes its known for-- the run through the Louvre, the minute of silence. Nobody ever cites Anna Karina getting popped in the mouth. Is the dramatic tonal shift that occurs during the actual robbery an homage to Godard's noir source material, a kind of wry tribute, or is it supposed to be a legitimate narrative development? I'd say the former, considering that the movie ends with a Chaplin reference and the jokey promise of a sequel, but its still somewhat shocking to see the goofy, charming main characters transform into brutal thugs. It works in the context of the movie, I think, but its interesting how this aspect is often glossed over, both in criticism and in the memory.

I Guess: I can't say this is anywhere near Godard's best movie, but as a brisk, funny and good-natured paean to pulp fiction and the aimless thrills of hanging around it works. Criterion of course does a great job with the sound and visuals-- its something there's really isn't a good reason not to see, but definitely don't watch it and decide your Godard-watchin' quota is filled for life. If you like it, which you probably will, take the opportunity to get deeper into his work. Alphaville is a great next step.

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Foam of the Daze




















Boris Vian

This Thing: Is the newest translation of Vian's 1947 L'Ecume des Jours, a sort of existential Alice in Wonderland by way of Bernie Wooster.

Best Bit: The unbelievably strange and charming turn-table cake. Jean-Sol Partre. Jazz and pretty girls.

Worst Bit: Vian's female characters were a little flat, and, to be bitchy, if you're going to include as many annotations as this translation does, it would be cool to have them as footnotes instead of all clumped together in the back of the book.

Couldn't Believe: How startling and how startlingly effective the shift in tone about halfway through is. How huge this book's reputation is in France in comparison to its relative obscurity over here.

I Guess: I can't understate the complete reversal this book's tone undergoes from the first pages to the last while maintaining a consistent voice. It goes from a totally charming and adorable literary dessert to one of the most wrenching and brutal conclusions I've read in a long, long time, without seeming contrived or obvious. Vian and translator Brian Harper both deserve the hugest of props. Read this.

Wednesday, March 12, 2008

Can't Stop Won't Stop: A History of the Hip-Hop Generation




















Chang, Jeff. 2005. Picador.

This Thing: Is less a book about hip-hop so much as it is a history of American urban culture in a post-Civil Rights Movement world. Chang weaves the origins and evolution of hip-hop culture into the story of America's under-privileged idealists and opportunists.

Best Bits: Chang's integration of political science, sociology, music and history. Public Enemy. Civic outrage.

Worst Bits: Late in the book, Chang seems to sort of lose interest in the musical side of things-- as soon as hip-hop becomes a commercial commodity, his investment basically flies out the window. Sure, he has a right to focus on the activist issues that clearly fascinate him, but is it really a complete history of the generation if you skimp out on its growth into a hugely visible discourse?

Couldn't Believe: Many of the incredibly juicy anecdotes he works in throughout the book. Ever wonder about how the cocaine industry turned into the crack industry? What the deal with Flava Flav was? When, exactly, Ice Cube sold out? Wonder no more.

I Guess: As uneven and flawed as this book feels at times, its still a riveting and really fun read. It has the flow and appeal of its source material, and is surprisingly eye-opening in terms of the country's disgraceful urban policies in the past forty years. Check it out, but don't feel bad about skimming once in a while.